Skip to content
I Might Be Digitally Schizophrenic

Founder Brand

I Might Be Digitally Schizophrenic

And before you commit me to Chinama, hear me out.

And before you commit me to Chinama, hear me out.

I think I'm schizophrenic. Digitally.

Not the clinical kind; put the phone down, nobody is booking me a bed at Chinama. I mean the founder kind. The kind where you wake up and there are two of you online. One is a man. The other is a brand. And somewhere along the way you started running them as two different people, on two different accounts, in two different voices, telling two different stories to two different rooms.

I did this for a long time without noticing. And I'm now fairly sure it was quietly hurting me the whole time.

Here's the confession under the confession: I'm not special. Most founders I know are doing the exact same thing. We live double, sometimes triple lives online, because somewhere we were handed a rule and we never questioned it: your brand must be separate from you. The company over here, polished and serious. The man over there, allowed to be human, but only after hours, only where it won't scare the clients.

We want our lives to show up one way and our brands to show up another. And I'll be honest with you; that instinct is not stupid. There is a real argument for keeping them apart.

Start with professionalism. When someone is deciding whether to trust you with their money, their business, their compliance, they want to see a serious operator, not a man mid-laugh with his kids. The fear is old and simple: if they see the whole human, they will stop taking the work seriously. So we build a suited, sharpened version of ourselves and we send him out to do the selling, while the real one stays home.

Then there's audience. The finance manager shopping for an invoicing tool and the old friend who just wants a laugh are not the same viewer. One feed cannot comfortably serve both. Put a dance clip next to a pricing breakdown and you irritate both rooms at once. Separation keeps each audience fed exactly what it came for. Clean. Tidy. Efficient.

There's protection, too. Some of us split on purpose to keep the sacred things; family, faith, the private interior; out of the commercial glare. Not because we're hiding, but because not everything is for sale, and a guarded personal space is a boundary, not a brand flaw.

And there's risk. If the personal account ever says something clumsy or divisive, the brand stays clean on the other side of the wall. Separation is insurance.

Put it all together and that is a genuinely solid case. It is also the case almost every business book taught us. Keep the logo pure. Keep the founder at a distance. The human is a liability; manage the exposure.

Except the world moved. And it moved in the opposite direction to the rule.

We now live in a time where the most magnetic brands on earth are inseparable from the humans behind them, and not by accident. Look around.

Richard Branson never really sold Virgin; he sold Richard Branson. The ballooning, the islands, the willingness to look ridiculous in public. You don't board a Virgin flight because of a logo; you board because one man made you believe it would be more fun than the alternative.

Sara Blakely built Spanx into an empire, and the story that travels ahead of the product is hers, not the product's; the woman who cut the feet off her pantyhose, got told no by every mill in the country, and funded the whole dream on a few thousand dollars of savings. The struggle is the sell. The human is the hook.

Steven Bartlett built a media brand by broadcasting the parts most founders hide; the failures, the anxiety, the near-collapses, out loud and first. The vulnerability is not a leak in the brand. The vulnerability is the brand.

And closest to home, Strive Masiyiwa; one of the most respected founders this continent has produced; writes long, personal, faith-soaked posts about his own journey. The doubt, the setbacks, the God he leans on. Millions of young Africans follow the man, and in following the man they come to trust the company. His witness and his brand are the same thing.

See the pattern? Every one of them broke the rule I was so carefully obeying. They did not protect the brand by hiding the human. They built the brand by revealing him.

Because here is what I finally understood. The separation was never protecting my brand. It was starving it. It was hiding the one thing no competitor can copy; me. Anyone can build a better feature. Anyone can undercut a price. Nobody else can be the man who dances, and builds, and prays, and tells the bedtime story, and shows you all of it in the light. That range is not a mess to be tidied away. That range is the product.

So I made a decision.

I'm killing one platform. The polished one. The suited stranger I sent out to do my selling while the real me stayed where it was warm. And I'm going all in on the most personal platform I have; the one my friends and my family are already on; the room where I have never once had to pretend to be one thing.

Because I don't think I was ever actually two people. I think I was one man who got talked into playing two. And I was made whole, not in pieces.

One man. In the light. That is the whole strategy.

Out-believe reality.

Useful? Now score the brand behind the business.

Keep reading

One idea at a time. No filler.

Back to insights